trial was resumed in Cordoba against Jorge Rafael Videla and continued the arguments of the defense. Carlos's lawyers declared Yanicelli, Fernando Rocha, Calixto Luis Flores, Cayetano Ricardo Rocha, Gustavo Salgado, Gustavo Alsina and Mauritius Poncet.
asked their acquittals on the basis of denying that the case of crimes against humanity, and that Thus, if there had been crimes are prescribed
"I call criminal prescribing over time due to absence of declaration of crimes against humanity before, having been called to statements inquiries to be an offense subject to a criminal offense and have not been expressly stated as a crime against humanity. Corresponds to the prescription by the lapse of time. "
"I call criminal prescribing over time due to absence of declaration of crimes against humanity before, having been called to statements inquiries to be an offense subject to a criminal offense and have not been expressly stated as a crime against humanity. Corresponds to the prescription by the lapse of time. "
also requested the unconstitutionality of all proceedings and to reject the evidence of witnesses" There is an orphan evidence in this case. "One of the pearls that were launched in the allegation was "In Nuremberg did not sit on the bench who threw the bomb on Hiroshima."
Finally, it argues a violation of the Constitution to defend who suspended the same to develop a plan of state terrorism
0 comments:
Post a Comment