Where you should be
Roberto Luis Armando Albornoz and Candide were in a common jail for crimes they committed in Tucumán. The first will remain in prison at home, the second was released
Cradle of state terrorism in 1975 with "Operation Independence" dictatorship devastated by Antonio Domingo Bussi, Tucumán not have a single repressor sentenced to prison. Despite the "imminent risk" to witnesses cited by the Federal Court in its ruling last June, when he ordered the genocide serve their sentences in an ordinary prison, the Chamber III of the National Chamber of Criminal Appeal overturned the decision with unusual speed and allowed to leave the prison of Villa Urquiza Robert Heriberto Luis Armando Albornoz and Candide, the only two defendants who were not at home. Tucumán regional children described as "shameful" decision Liliana Catucci, and Angela Mitchell Gustavo Ledesma.
's top criminal court in the nation often take time to confirm judgments in cases involving crimes against humanity. Forty failures in the last five years, Cassation confirmed eleven, of which only three were reviewed by the Supreme Court and are technically "strong." The delay allowed to remain free and will not reconsider the mode of execution of sentence of oppressors who paid large sums to avoid prison, and Jorge Olivera Róvere, Brigadier Caesar Comes and Hippolytus or Colonel Bernardo Mariani Menendez, who has the luxury of a lawyer to defend his comrades in misfortune.
tucumano If the court showed that there is always slow. In July last year, after listening for months to survivors and relatives of victims of the former Police Chief of Tucumán, the local TOF sentenced to life imprisonment Albornoz, the former head of the clandestine center, and 18 years in prison Police De Candido. Because the law allows the benefit of house arrest for those over seventy years (Albornoz was 78 years old, De Candido, 71), the members of the court discussed how compliance of the sentence. Criterion was imposed and Josefina Carlos Jiménez Montilla Curi (Gabriel Casas dissenting vote), to revoke the house arrest of former right hand Bussi and the release of his subordinate. In their case highlighted the history of intimidation of witnesses, both of The Eye Albornoz, who had also violated his house arrest, as De Candido, recognized by the victims as one of the most ferocious of the former Chief torturers.
After seven months of failure and without ruling on the merits of the decision, the Appeals Chamber III decided to roll back the situation at the beginning of the trial, read unlock and lock De Candido in her house robe, who led torture sessions against hundreds of Tucuman. "The interpretation of the rules, especially when it concerns the freedom of individuals or morigeración the place of detention, must be restrictive. To revoke the house arrest or order the detention of an accused must be objective factors that would sustain it there, or to suspect "risk of litigation, which is not present in cars," wrote Catucci, Mitchel and Ledesma. Children
Tucumán expressed its "strongest condemnation" of the resolution and noted that "the strong intention of favor genocidal terrorism responsible for the deplorable state has a history: it was the same House that excarceló Astiz and Tigre Acosta, afford the luxury of solving the forms of execution of punishment without first resolving the merits. " Since the reopening of cases in 2003 occurred in Tucumán only two trials that resulted in five convictions. "A constant delay with Azcuénaga megacauses as Arsenal who has spent years waiting to be elevated to trial-lamented children," adds Cassation's decision to send home to the only two genocide who were serving their sentences in prisons common. Is it righteousness? "
Roberto Luis Armando Albornoz and Candide were in a common jail for crimes they committed in Tucumán. The first will remain in prison at home, the second was released
Cradle of state terrorism in 1975 with "Operation Independence" dictatorship devastated by Antonio Domingo Bussi, Tucumán not have a single repressor sentenced to prison. Despite the "imminent risk" to witnesses cited by the Federal Court in its ruling last June, when he ordered the genocide serve their sentences in an ordinary prison, the Chamber III of the National Chamber of Criminal Appeal overturned the decision with unusual speed and allowed to leave the prison of Villa Urquiza Robert Heriberto Luis Armando Albornoz and Candide, the only two defendants who were not at home. Tucumán regional children described as "shameful" decision Liliana Catucci, and Angela Mitchell Gustavo Ledesma.
's top criminal court in the nation often take time to confirm judgments in cases involving crimes against humanity. Forty failures in the last five years, Cassation confirmed eleven, of which only three were reviewed by the Supreme Court and are technically "strong." The delay allowed to remain free and will not reconsider the mode of execution of sentence of oppressors who paid large sums to avoid prison, and Jorge Olivera Róvere, Brigadier Caesar Comes and Hippolytus or Colonel Bernardo Mariani Menendez, who has the luxury of a lawyer to defend his comrades in misfortune.
tucumano If the court showed that there is always slow. In July last year, after listening for months to survivors and relatives of victims of the former Police Chief of Tucumán, the local TOF sentenced to life imprisonment Albornoz, the former head of the clandestine center, and 18 years in prison Police De Candido. Because the law allows the benefit of house arrest for those over seventy years (Albornoz was 78 years old, De Candido, 71), the members of the court discussed how compliance of the sentence. Criterion was imposed and Josefina Carlos Jiménez Montilla Curi (Gabriel Casas dissenting vote), to revoke the house arrest of former right hand Bussi and the release of his subordinate. In their case highlighted the history of intimidation of witnesses, both of The Eye Albornoz, who had also violated his house arrest, as De Candido, recognized by the victims as one of the most ferocious of the former Chief torturers.
After seven months of failure and without ruling on the merits of the decision, the Appeals Chamber III decided to roll back the situation at the beginning of the trial, read unlock and lock De Candido in her house robe, who led torture sessions against hundreds of Tucuman. "The interpretation of the rules, especially when it concerns the freedom of individuals or morigeración the place of detention, must be restrictive. To revoke the house arrest or order the detention of an accused must be objective factors that would sustain it there, or to suspect "risk of litigation, which is not present in cars," wrote Catucci, Mitchel and Ledesma. Children
Tucumán expressed its "strongest condemnation" of the resolution and noted that "the strong intention of favor genocidal terrorism responsible for the deplorable state has a history: it was the same House that excarceló Astiz and Tigre Acosta, afford the luxury of solving the forms of execution of punishment without first resolving the merits. " Since the reopening of cases in 2003 occurred in Tucumán only two trials that resulted in five convictions. "A constant delay with Azcuénaga megacauses as Arsenal who has spent years waiting to be elevated to trial-lamented children," adds Cassation's decision to send home to the only two genocide who were serving their sentences in prisons common. Is it righteousness? "
0 comments:
Post a Comment