Naravaja The complainants Vaca and Martinez filed an appeal against the ruling that acquitted Cano Pino, D `Aloia.os Quiroga and prosecuting attorneys, and Mary Naravaja Hugo Vaca Elba Martinez today filed an appeal against the ruling that acquitted Pino Victor Cano, Osvaldo Quiroga and Paul D'Aloia, accused of crimes against humanity during the last military dictatorship.
This was confirmed by Hugo Vaca Narvaja lawyer who acted as prosecutor in the case in which the shooting was considered an escape attempt at setting the prison unit number (UP1) from his father, Miguel Hugo Vaca Narvaja Higinio with Gustavo Toranzo and Breuil, 12 August 1976.
In the appeal, the lawyers rejected the acquittal of the accused issued by the Federal Oral Court No. 1 (TOF1), composed by Jaime Diaz Gavier judges, Carlos Lascano and José María Pérez Villalobos, last December.
In this sense considered as a "syllogism failed" the court's decision, arguing that if "yes there was a systematic plan (extermination) in a given territory: the UP1 who was in charge of the IV Brigade where transfers were made to cover up shootings, which integrated the IV Brigade Quiroga, who made transfers that resulted in executions, and Quiroga can not be acquitted. "
Martínez Vaca Narvaja and stated that the military's statement during the trial, "clearly lies are detected that the Tribunal warned in its foundations "as is" false identity unaware of the victims, since signature removed, particularly in the subset of Miguel Hugo Vaca Narvaja.
"You know there were four he admits as moving as the `conditioned`. He knew his identity, because that's what he signed. Quiroga is not acceptable that Vaca Narvaja know who it was, let alone newcomers "Operation Independence, and even less with the public significance of his brother Fernando, one of the leaders of Montoneros.
" Failure. "Note below that the court "fails to consider that not only Quiroga was part of the structure to remove these detainees, but endorsed and accompanied all the circumstances, as Vaca Narvaja harassment on the father or the reference to Mrs Maria Luisa Montaldo, activist known in those days fighting against fraudulent subdivisions. "
"Quiroga, who was under the orders of Cano Pino, I knew who he was and what it was, came from Tucuman to it and got his consent in December 1976 to the rank of captain."
"Another proof is omitted farewell Vaca Narvaja performs the same saying: "Until victory always mates, going to shoot me," and ruled that "the` worried `Quiroga, was promoted in December of that year and on sheet 1 of your file says:" Folio 6. Ascent of first lieutenant to captain. December 31, 1976. "
"This man, he adds, who says he was raised in the truth, he used his chance to honor the truth as the accused and lied. The Argentine military official, however, rejected the laws of impunity as it was for all true soldiers of the fatherland. "
appeal also rejected the view put forward by TOF1, saying that "it is false that the transfers occur overnight, in irregular, concealing or misrepresenting the identity of the military The retreating front of the prison authorities. "
" the Court says that an army acted during business hours, and was legal, and other after hours, and was illegal.
An absurd that no justification in the records of the case. The ruling on this point becomes quite arbitrary. In addition, Quiroga is recognized as an operational picture of the Fourth Brigade, responsible for implementation of a systematic plan described by the Court, "the lawyers added.
also argue that there was" improper grounding, decision logic, syllogism incorrect Reliance on inconsistent statements, which become irreversibly arbitrary subjective basis, allowing the acquittal of the accused if the complaint had requested life imprisonment for the accused.
This was confirmed by Hugo Vaca Narvaja lawyer who acted as prosecutor in the case in which the shooting was considered an escape attempt at setting the prison unit number (UP1) from his father, Miguel Hugo Vaca Narvaja Higinio with Gustavo Toranzo and Breuil, 12 August 1976.
In the appeal, the lawyers rejected the acquittal of the accused issued by the Federal Oral Court No. 1 (TOF1), composed by Jaime Diaz Gavier judges, Carlos Lascano and José María Pérez Villalobos, last December.
In this sense considered as a "syllogism failed" the court's decision, arguing that if "yes there was a systematic plan (extermination) in a given territory: the UP1 who was in charge of the IV Brigade where transfers were made to cover up shootings, which integrated the IV Brigade Quiroga, who made transfers that resulted in executions, and Quiroga can not be acquitted. "
Martínez Vaca Narvaja and stated that the military's statement during the trial, "clearly lies are detected that the Tribunal warned in its foundations "as is" false identity unaware of the victims, since signature removed, particularly in the subset of Miguel Hugo Vaca Narvaja.
"You know there were four he admits as moving as the `conditioned`. He knew his identity, because that's what he signed. Quiroga is not acceptable that Vaca Narvaja know who it was, let alone newcomers "Operation Independence, and even less with the public significance of his brother Fernando, one of the leaders of Montoneros.
" Failure. "Note below that the court "fails to consider that not only Quiroga was part of the structure to remove these detainees, but endorsed and accompanied all the circumstances, as Vaca Narvaja harassment on the father or the reference to Mrs Maria Luisa Montaldo, activist known in those days fighting against fraudulent subdivisions. "
"Quiroga, who was under the orders of Cano Pino, I knew who he was and what it was, came from Tucuman to it and got his consent in December 1976 to the rank of captain."
"Another proof is omitted farewell Vaca Narvaja performs the same saying: "Until victory always mates, going to shoot me," and ruled that "the` worried `Quiroga, was promoted in December of that year and on sheet 1 of your file says:" Folio 6. Ascent of first lieutenant to captain. December 31, 1976. "
"This man, he adds, who says he was raised in the truth, he used his chance to honor the truth as the accused and lied. The Argentine military official, however, rejected the laws of impunity as it was for all true soldiers of the fatherland. "
appeal also rejected the view put forward by TOF1, saying that "it is false that the transfers occur overnight, in irregular, concealing or misrepresenting the identity of the military The retreating front of the prison authorities. "
" the Court says that an army acted during business hours, and was legal, and other after hours, and was illegal.
An absurd that no justification in the records of the case. The ruling on this point becomes quite arbitrary. In addition, Quiroga is recognized as an operational picture of the Fourth Brigade, responsible for implementation of a systematic plan described by the Court, "the lawyers added.
also argue that there was" improper grounding, decision logic, syllogism incorrect Reliance on inconsistent statements, which become irreversibly arbitrary subjective basis, allowing the acquittal of the accused if the complaint had requested life imprisonment for the accused.
